<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML Sitemaps Is Preferred By Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog To Improve Ranking In Google With Search Optimization. Work At Home Full Time With Blogging And SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atniz</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9952</link>
		<dc:creator>Atniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-9952</guid>
		<description>I never heard any site have 2 sitemaps on. I guess one will do with good navigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never heard any site have 2 sitemaps on. I guess one will do with good navigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atniz</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9945</link>
		<dc:creator>Atniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-9945</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still using XML sitemap and almost all my new post get indexed within few minutes. I think Google is still doing good with XML. But, if there is an option, I&#039;m willing to try it as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still using XML sitemap and almost all my new post get indexed within few minutes. I think Google is still doing good with XML. But, if there is an option, I&#8217;m willing to try it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atniz</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9943</link>
		<dc:creator>Atniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-9943</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that is the reason why Google prefer html over xml sitemap. But, I noticed a lot of blogspot blogs tend to get at the end of results page in any keywords searched over google too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that is the reason why Google prefer html over xml sitemap. But, I noticed a lot of blogspot blogs tend to get at the end of results page in any keywords searched over google too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atniz</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-9939</link>
		<dc:creator>Atniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-9939</guid>
		<description>Most probably, Google&#039;s bot is not ready to read well XML compared to html. I&#039;m sure there must be something before Matt Cutts recommending something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most probably, Google&#8217;s bot is not ready to read well XML compared to html. I&#8217;m sure there must be something before Matt Cutts recommending something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newest gadgets</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8969</link>
		<dc:creator>Newest gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-8969</guid>
		<description>A website needs both. XML site map is required for search engines and HTML site map is for human..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A website needs both. XML site map is required for search engines and HTML site map is for human..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oes Tsetnoc</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8960</link>
		<dc:creator>Oes Tsetnoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-8960</guid>
		<description>Despite that the XML sitemap is not friendly for human and intended for spiders of SEs, still it can be useful to generate a HTML sitemap or just use its XML style template to generate a HTML like sitemap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite that the XML sitemap is not friendly for human and intended for spiders of SEs, still it can be useful to generate a HTML sitemap or just use its XML style template to generate a HTML like sitemap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8956</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-8956</guid>
		<description>Hello Web Templates,
Google always tells us to create site for human visitors and not for SE&#039;s. html sitemaps are good and easy for humans but xml format is not. I think that may be the reason.
Anyway Google seems to be least interested with their own blogger.

Thanks
Atniz
TC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Web Templates,<br />
Google always tells us to create site for human visitors and not for SE&#8217;s. html sitemaps are good and easy for humans but xml format is not. I think that may be the reason.<br />
Anyway Google seems to be least interested with their own blogger.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Atniz<br />
TC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Templates</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Templates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>Why would Google care about the format? That seems strange. IMO there should be no discernable difference especially if you use a style sheet with the XML sitemap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Google care about the format? That seems strange. IMO there should be no discernable difference especially if you use a style sheet with the XML sitemap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atniz</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8935</link>
		<dc:creator>Atniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-8935</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a while I left blogspot blogs, so, I am not really good in SEO for blogspot blogs. Frankly, there will be some sort of limitation if we are bond to blogspot blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while I left blogspot blogs, so, I am not really good in SEO for blogspot blogs. Frankly, there will be some sort of limitation if we are bond to blogspot blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atniz</title>
		<link>http://atniz.com/2009/10/10/google-html-sitemaps-is-preferred-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8934</link>
		<dc:creator>Atniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atniz.com/?p=1230#comment-8934</guid>
		<description>I hope for that too. I couldn&#039;t find it on google, hope some good developer will do it for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope for that too. I couldn&#8217;t find it on google, hope some good developer will do it for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/20 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 378/390 objects using disk: basic

Served from: atniz.com @ 2012-05-23 09:06:47 -->
